How to Manage Technical Debt in Software Development?
A term that is familiar in the software development world is that of technical debt. Technical debt works just like financial debt: it builds up when shortcuts are taken in the name of time-to-ship-or-blast and eventually leads to suboptimal code, design or architectural decisions. Although these "savings" yield short-term benefits, their interest accumulates and eventually makes it very difficult to deal with them, even affecting the future stability and scalability of the system.
Good management of technical debt is a must to keep healthy the continuance of the development process, high-quality software, and business goals that exceed the immediate years. Thus this blog will provide insight into how to identify, manage, and reduce technical debt sustainably.
What is Technical Debt?
Technical debt is that extra work that needs to be done to maintain or improve a software system due to decisions in the past that favoured speed of delivery over quality. Technical debt can arise due to some of the following factors:
Development was rushed to meet project deadlines.
There are no proper documentation and tests.
Inadequate or obsolete coding practices.
A short-term fix is unlikely to scale for the long haul.
No code refactoring or optimization was involved.
Technical debt can help in speeding up the initial development process; however, if unchecked, it slows down development cycles, increases the number of bugs, and causes maintenance problems for the software.
How to Manage Technical Debt?
1. Acknowledge and Identify Technical Debt Early
Recognizing technical debt is the first step to managing it. Somehow it's a naked truth. And it may seem easy to dismiss or postpone the presence of technical debt, especially when the team is deep in feature development or under an oppressive deadline. However, early debt identification prevents its accumulation.
Sample ways to identify technical debt:
Code reviews: Regular code reviews will reveal inefficient, outdated, or hard-to-understand code at early stages.
Automated tests: Code coverage for automated tests will indicate those sections that might cause errors and prove to be points of indication for technical debts.
Developer feedback: Encourage developers to suffer in silence when it comes to flagging things in code that have been shortcuts or where the code is harder to maintain or extend than it should be.
2. Prioritize Technical Debt:
Not all technical debt is created equal. Some bandwidth requires urgent attention while others will lay pending future attention. It is important to prioritize technical debt and decide which particular portions will be given importance to obtain the most value.
This is how you can prioritize:
Impact on system performance: If any aspect of the technical debt causes adverse performance, security, or scalability issues, it should be on top of the priority list.
Cost for future changes: Those parts of the code base that will frequently be changed or added on in the future should thus be put at the top of 'refactor' efforts to prevent the multiplying of the debt across time.
Failure risk: Technical debt making the system rocky and bug-prone should get more attention than it has been getting.
3. Implement a "Definition of Done" (DoD)
A Definition of Done is a specification that ensures that the completed code also meets high quality standards. By having a clear DoD you can avoid the technical debt right at the time of development.
Some of the following could be included in your DoD:
Code quality standards: the standards and best practices must be followed while coding.
Complete testing: Written tests for new features and also for refactored code.
Documentation: All change codes should be well documented to avoid knowledge silos or problems in understanding the code base later on.
You avoid developing technical debt in the first place by following your DoD.
4. Refactor Regularly
Refactoring is the process of changing the structure of existing code without modifying its external behaviour. It's one of the best ways of managing and reducing technical liabilities. This process ought to be continuous and not a one-off task. Refactoring should be part of a continuous development cycle and practice keeping a clean and maintainable codebase.
Some tips for effective refactoring include:
Bit by bit: Refactor small pieces of code, focusing on one area of the code base, at a time. Huge refactoring may lead to complications and new problems.
Automated tests: Have automated tests in place always before refactoring begins. They will make sure that existing functionality is not damaged in the whole process.
Iterative improvements: Break down large refactor operations so an integral part isn't all disrupted at once. Doing this reduces risk and makes it easier to identify mistakes.
5. Allocate Time for Technical Debt Management
Technical Debt should be a first-class citizen in your process and you must have appropriate time allocated to management around how you will treat technical debt. This can include:
Sprint time for addressing technical debt: Consider designating certain sprints or cycles specifically to pay down the technical debt with a focus on refactoring, improving code quality or eliminating bottlenecks.
Integrate with regular work: Instead of having separate sprints for debt paybacks, it may be considered to have technical debt tasks added to the normal sprint backlog to keep everything in check.
The key is to hence devote time regularly to address the debt and not delay it until it becomes a huge problem.
Why Softronix?
Softronix is a multidisciplinary innovator in the sector of IT: from software development to system integration through to IT consulting. Well constituted with manpower and heartily inclined to the client, Softronix provides tailor-made, inexpensive solutions that suit all your business objectives currently based on high-paid technologies leading to sustainable success for your firm. Proven performance record and excellence commitment make them dependably an innovative partner to all your technology needs.
Conclusion
It is imperative to handle the technical debt in software development concerning working healthily and sustainable. Early identification of the debt, right prioritization of critical areas to be improved, establishment of good clear development practices, and allocation of time for refactoring and improving the code will ensure that technical debt does not slow the speed of progress for development teams.
A proactive approach also towards technical debt allows development teams to have a clean, high-quality code base that tends to lead long years into successfully enabling rapid innovation and better performance with Softronix now!
0 comments